February2
I want better service, now! I am sick of paying $60 for DSL when we should have Fiber Optic service in every home by now. This comes at a time when SBC/AT&T merged into a mega corporation that is taking money from both ends, the government and its customers, and doing nothing about upgrading the sub-par infrastructure.
Let There Be Wi-Fi
American residents and businesses now pay two to three times as much for slower and poorer quality service than countries like South Korea or Japan. Since 2001, according to the International Telecommunications Union, the United States has fallen from fourth to 16th in the world in broadband penetration. Thomas Bleha recently argued in Foreign Affairs that what passes for broadband in the United States is “the slowest, most expensive and least reliable in the developed world.” While about 60 percent of U.S. households do not subscribe to broadband because it is either unavailable where they live or they cannot afford it, most Japanese citizens can access a high-speed connection that’s more than 10 times faster than what’s available here for just $22 a month. (Japan is now rolling out ultra-high speed access at more than 500 times what the Federal Communications Commission considers to be “broadband” in this country.)
President Bush has been quoted as saying “universal, affordable access for broadband technology by the year 2007″ and FCC Chairman Kevin Martin says it is the most important thing he is working on. 2006 should be the year when SBC and the other telecommunication companies upgrade their infrastructure bringing the good ole USA inline with the rest of the developing world, but I doubt that this will happen. Bush is too much in the pocket of companies and cares little for the American people. Even if he did care a minuscule amount he is incapable of doing anything about it because he is incompetent at his job.
$200 Billion Broadband Scandal.
# The promised networks couldn�t be built in 1993 and state laws were changed based on �deceptive speech�. The technology today still has problems delivering 500 channels.
# The phone companies pulled a bait and switch. In order to offer DSL over copper, it was not necessary to have state regulation changed. Their plan was to get rid of regulations and enter long distance.
I shouldn’t be forced to pay higher rates for DSL when the local capable companies are offering more than 2x speed cable connections for $10 less. Yet this is exactly what is happening because I am stuck in a crappy apartment complex who has signed agreements with this small cable company who supposedly “owns” the wires in the complex. Their service is even more of a rip off than SBC DSL alternative.
Ignition broadband is based out of Seattle and when I called setup service for my apartment in Texas they informed me that I must pay for “community television service” which included to channels “2-13″. I complained several times and could not get these extra charges dropped, as all I wanted was broadband. I was not thrilled to be forced to pay television stations that came in FOR FREE via a UHF antenna that I already owned; so I decided I would rather go with the, take-it-up-the-ass, AT&T/SBC DSL service.
AT&T sees benefits to tiered Internet service
AT&T, not to be confused with the original AT&T, is talking about a “tiered Internet” experience again. Back when they were still known as SBC, CEO Edward Whitacre dropped a bomb when he proclaimed his dissatisfaction with the fact that Internet service companies can “use [his] pipes for free”�referencing the fact that their broadband users are currently free to use their connection for more or less any legitimate activity, including downloading large videos and placing phone calls. Whitacre’s rhetoric, which is by no means unique to him, slyly references the company’s Internet infrastructure as “his pipes,” ignoring the fact that it is his customers who are both paying for those pipes and expecting uninhibited use for any legitimate activity. Why?
The freepress has a good article on what is actually happening with the telecommunication companies. AT&T is trying to charge companies like Google and Yahoo to allow for their content to get to customers who sign up for higher bandwidth connections to be guaranteed that they will get the content that they should be getting ALREADY. I mean how greedy can you get AT&T you are already charging your customers outrageous prices for long distance when you consider what you get for a VoIP connection. This does not mention the outrageous prices for a high speed service that should be 2-10x as fast as it is currently and roughly 1/2 the price of what everyone is paying now.
A new telecommunications bill comes before The House this month will address these issues. I suggest that you do not delay in contacting Rep. Joe Barton from Texas and Dem. John Dingle from Michigan who are on the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Not that it is going to do much good because Republicans usually side with the corporations who hand them big campaign donations for their decisions. Politicians think of campaign donations as “perks” of the job when in actuality they are nothing less than bribes. America needs major political reform. It is sad that the rich corporations can control government policy to the degree that they do.
I ask you Joe Barton where is my cheap affordable high-speed that I was promised back in the ’90s because it certainly isn’t here today.