Global Warming Capable of Sparking Mass Species Extinctions

Global Warming Capable of Sparking Mass Species Extinctions

So what is worse, overpopulation and millions of humans dying from starvation or causing mass extinction of other species? It seems to me if we had less people and all worked together and had a fair, equitable, egalitarian global society we wouldn’t have to consider that tradeoff. That is what we are faced with now.

The study expands on a much-debated 2004 paper published in the journal Nature that suggested a quarter of the world’s species would be committed to extinction by 2050 as a result of global warming. This latest study picks up where the Nature paper left off, incorporating critiques and suggestions from other scientists while increasing the global scope of the research to include diverse hotspots around the world. The results reinforce the massive species extinction risks identified in the 2004 study.

“Climate change is rapidly becoming the most serious threats to the planet’s biodiversity,” said lead author Dr. Jay Malcolm, an assistant forestry professor at the University of Toronto. “This study provides even stronger scientific evidence that global warming will result in catastrophic species loss across the planet.”

One problem would be a further increase in global warming as healthier people produce more greenhouse gasses.

  • http://makaipa.blogspot.com boinkie

    Ah, but to make a “a fair, equitable, egalitarian global society” usualy means to kill off the untermensch…
    It was why the idealistic English landlords thew the irish off their land during the potato famine: Because they visualized replacing the chaotic overworked plots with small prosperous farmers, and to do this, they had to get rid of those living there.

  • http://makaipa.blogspot.com boinkie

    Ah, but to make a “a fair, equitable, egalitarian global society” usualy means to kill off the untermensch…
    It was why the idealistic English landlords thew the irish off their land during the potato famine: Because they visualized replacing the chaotic overworked plots with small prosperous farmers, and to do this, they had to get rid of those living there.

  • http://llbbl.com Logan Lindquist

    Either way we are doing it to ourselves. Population control at least we have more choice/control in the matter. Either control our population or the earth does it for us. The most important thing in life is the preservation of the human species. If we have to choose which babies are born so that entire species can continue to exist that is a tradeoff I am willing to make. Our population now is heavily depandent on our food production capacity.

  • http://llbbl.com Logan Lindquist

    Either way we are doing it to ourselves. Population control at least we have more choice/control in the matter. Either control our population or the earth does it for us. The most important thing in life is the preservation of the human species. If we have to choose which babies are born so that entire species can continue to exist that is a tradeoff I am willing to make. Our population now is heavily depandent on our food production capacity.